The planet will continue to cook.
There are probably already too many people on the planet.
I found the source of global warming is coming from the hot air coming out of Washington.
Collective human actions are transforming, even ravaging, the biosphere - perhaps irreversibly - through global warming and loss of biodiversity.
Global warming is more of a blessing than a curse.
How much damage will have been done before we act?
Since I am no longer affiliated with any organization nor receiving any funding, I can speak quite frankly....As a scientist I remain skeptical.
I believe that global warming is a myth. And so, therefore, I have no conscience problems at all and I'm going to buy a Suburban next time.
Decades of scientific research has proven that carbon pollution is harmful to human health and causes global warming.
Have we failed to slow global warming pollution in part because climate and environmental activists have been too polite and well behaved?
According to a new UN report, the global warming outlook is much worse than originally predicted. Which is pretty bad, when they originally predicted it would destroy the planet.
Esso has been the main one in America spreading the disinformation that there is no global warming problem.
Much of the debate over global warming is predicated on fear, rather than science.
To be clear, geoengineering won't solve global warming. It's not a 'techno-fix.' It would be enormously risky and almost certainly lead to troubling unforeseen consequences.
Vegetation is really controlling what happens...whereas the emphasis in the climate models has always been on the atmosphere.
For innovators who find safe and workable solutions to global warming, the rewards will be staggering.
Society's emissions of carbon dioxide may or may not turn out to have something significant to do with global warming-the jury is still out.
The conversation on global warming has been stalled because a shrinking group of denialists fly into a rage when it's mentioned.
But, when it comes to global warming, the public- at-large really doesn't know whom to believe anymore. And NASA has contributed to that confusion.
Time is running out to deal with climate change.
In any event, it has never been true that we ignore mainstream science; and anyone who reads AEI publications closely can see that we are not 'skeptics' about warming. It is possible to accept the general consensus about the existence of global warming while having valid questions about the extent of warming, the consequences of warming, and the appropriate responses.
With the nuclear threat we know that if sufficient weapons are used, human civilization - all of humankind - could be extinguished literally by "nuclear winter." So we have to see ourselves as part of the ultimate human group, just as we have to do with global warming.
Fight global warming! Be cool.
The evidence for man-made global warming is as final as the evidence of Auschwitz.
Global warming, indeed much of environmentalism, has become a new religion. Like the old religions, environmentalism preaches much good sense, is well meaning, but has a worrying lack of logic at its core.
