The new racism is anything that might hurt a Democrat politically.
Democrats don't represent the taxpayers, they represent the tax-consumers.
It's not so much about the cause, it's about feeling superior to political opponents.
Where the U.N. is concerned, accountability is very thin on the ground in general.
I can't say I'm surprised: the grassroots antiwar movement keeps turning out to be MoveOn/A.N.S.W.E.R. astroturf.
Bush is quite vulnerable if the Democrats pick the right issues. So far, though, they've shown their usual tendency to go for the capillary.
As I have said, the best Bush strategy is to put Congress on TV as often as possible.
Hmm. Petty? Yes. Ineffectual? Yes. Infuriating and off-putting? Yes. Counterproductive? Yes. It's got to be a product of the French Foreign Ministry.
Diplomacy has more to do with (credible) threats than with sweet reason. And threats from America are a lot more credible, nowadays.
If you're a Republican who's a threat to the Democrats, of course you are a racist. That's the definition of a racist, nowadays.
Never trust anyone who calls himself a libertarian socialist. They're bound to be deeply confused, at best.
