To understand this for sense it is not required that a man should be a geometrician or a logician, but that he should be mad.
Thomas Hobbes (1845). ““The” English Works of Thomas Hobbes of Malmesbury”, p.445
![To understand this for sense it is not required that a man should be a geometrician or a logician, but that he should be mad.](http://cdn.quoteddaily.com/images/thomas-hobbes/to-understand-this-for-sense-it-is-not-required-that-a-man-should-be-a-geometrician-or-a-logician-but.jpg)
To understand this for sense it is not required that a man should be a geometrician or a logician, but that he should be mad.