Authors:

I believe that the biblical teaching is clear. It always contests political power. It incites to "counterpower," to "positive" criticism, to an irreducible dialogue (like that between king and prophet in Israel), to antistatism, to a decentralizing of the relation, to an extreme relativizing of everything political, to an anti-ideology, to a questioning of all that claims either power or dominion (in other words, of all things political), and finally, if we may use a modern term, to a kind of "anarchism" (so long as we do not relate the term to the anarchist teaching of the nineteenth century).

"The Subversion of Christianity" by Jacques Ellul, translated by G. Bromiley, (p. 116), 1986.
I believe that the biblical teaching is clear. It always contests political power. It incites to counterpower, to positive criticism, to an irreducible dialogue (like that between king and prophet in Israel), to