An interview is only as good as both parties are willing to give to the interview and that includes the interviewer.
I'm a very slow reader, and books of interviews are an absolute favorite of mine.
In terms of publicity and interviews, well, it's really hard in this modern world to keep a sense of mystery.
I would get adult acne when it was somebody really famous I had to interview, so sometimes I would have to look straight at the camera because I couldn't look sideways or profile, because it would show.
Every time I do an interview, it's like serious therapy. But real therapy isn't something that I'd ever have. I feel fortunate that mentally everything is functioning well.
Writers have told me more than once that I'm a better interview in defeat than in victory, which is a compliment I am extremely proud of.
When I do these interviews, I get really nervous. And when I get nervous, it comes off as mellow for some reason.
Interviews are good if you want to be an actor because they raise your profile.
If she could have done one thing to make absolutely sure that every single person in this school will read your interview, it was banning it!
I could do an interview or just as well not do one. It's not like I'm looking for extra publicity.
I would like go to Palestine and interview people there about what their lives are like; same thing in Iran.
...in other words, all I want to be is the Jane Austen of south Alabama Interview - March 1964
It is harder to lie in an interview. A good interview - and it can be polite - is not a one way street like a candidate controlled ad. An interview is not programmed by the candidate and so the candidate can't be exactly sure what will be asked.
All these people I interview are worth ten times what I'm worth.
I would love to interview Roberto Benigni just so I could tell him how much his movie, life is beautiful, meant to me.
It's unfortunate that in an interview sometimes things can seem so black and white.
Everything has changed now. The world has changed. It surprises me to be on the forefront. I've lost all dignity! I give interviews! I make movies! I'm amazed at myself.
There's the trope about an impending "global-warming encyclical." The pope is preparing an encyclical on nature and the environment, including the human environment (which includes the moral imperative of a culturally affirmed and legally recognized right to life from conception until natural death). So what happens? A low-ranking Vatican official for self-promotion gives an interview to the Guardian in which he claims that this is a global-warming encyclical - which he couldn't possibly have known, as the document wasn't drafted yet.
I've said in many interviews that I like my fiction to be unpredictable. I like there to be considerable suspense.
I've spent days in cinemas answering questions from the audience, in interviews, travelling abroad, and all they do is thank me nicely.
When I was at the interview asked how I cope with life's difficulties, I said that saving sense of humor. I'm not lying.
Mike Wallace's interviews may make great television, but they don't produce great evidence.
One of the strengths of my interviews is that I really, honest to God, have no idea what people are going to say.
I don't want to be in my 'interview zone' mode. I've been doing a lot of interviews and I'm very self-aware of how I'm coming across.
I like the idea of interviews where you just talk about stuff instead of where it's my chance to talk to my public through something else.
