Nuclear Quotes - Page 14

It is not productive to see things in simple black and white, and talk in either anti-nuclear or pro-nuclear terms.

Nuclear Weapons merit unequivocal and unhesitating condemnation

As a boy I was a hermit crab, but I soon came out of my shell. Now I am a pincer crab, and soon I will be at my full power as a deadly nuclear lobster.

The idea that the growing demand for energy worldwide can be met with energy from nuclear power is nonsense.

Russia and the USA are two largest nuclear powers in the world; it's a really important relationship. How do we start making this work? How do we live with one another? How do we work with one another? We simply have to find a way to go forward.

My comedy is a nuclear bomb inside my mind. It's a weapon that's never been tested. It just blows up and flattens everybody.

A Britain which denounced the insanity of the nuclear strategy would be in a position to direct its influence at the United Nations and in the world at large, in a manner at present denied us

In contrast to my husband, I can pronounce the word nuclear.

The time is not far off when many nations in many parts of the world of many political shades and commitments will possess nuclear or even thermonuclear weapons.

Unfortunately, nuclear weapons have become identified with state power.

We are plunging headlong into a cold war, and we have 2,000 nuclear weapons on hair-trigger alert.

Nuclear power will be the Vietnam issue of the 1980s.

Only nuclear power can now halt global warming.

Well, I'm just quoting you when you [Donald Trump] were asked about a potential nuclear competition in Asia, you said, you know, go ahead, enjoy yourselves, folks.

A man you can bait with a Tweet is not a man we can trust with nuclear weapons.

It is the foremost responsibility of the United States, having been the predominant nuclear power, to take the lead in scaling this back and making good on its signed and sealed and ratified obligation in Article 6 of the non-proliferation treaty going back to '68 to eliminate this nuclear arsenal. That's a serious international obligation.

The American government is making nuclear weapons like there's no tomorrow.

Liberals have always opposed the concept of an independent nuclear deterrent.

If the United States wants to prevent other countries from acquiring the bomb, it must be prepared to reduce and eventually end its own reliance on nuclear weapons.

The world should contemplate a nuclear weapons-armed Iran with the greatest of concern.

American strategic [nuclear] forces do not exist solely for the purpose of deterring a Soviet nuclear threat or attack against the U.S. itself. Instead, they are intended to support U.S. foreign policy.

If ants had nuclear weapons, they would probably end the world in a week.

The foreign policy aim of ants can be summed up as follows: restless aggression, territorial conquest, and genocidal annihilation of neighboring colonies whenever possible. If ants had nuclear weapons, they would probably end the world in a week.

Iran . . . has failed to take the opportunity to demonstrate that its nuclear program is peaceful . . . time is not unlimited.

Must we wait for selection to solve the problems of overpopulation, exhaustion of resources, pollution of the environment and a nuclear holocaust, or can we take explicit steps to make our future more secure? In the latter case, must we not transcend selection?