Nuclear Quotes - Page 18

The `50s were terrifying with nuclear bomb stuff but boring in a social way and then the `60s were happening, and remember, there was no AIDS.

She stared at me. "Fly, ;ole, in an airplane, which you were warned never to do lest Zeus strike you out of the sky, AND carrying a weapon that has more destructive power than a nuclear bomb?" "Yeah," I said. "Pretty much exactly like that.

We shall continue, in this era of negotiation, to work for the limitation of nuclear arms and to reduce the danger of confrontation between the great powers.

What we said publicly is that we know that Saddam Hussein has chemical weapons, he's used them; we know about his biological weapons programs; and in the nuclear equation, left to his own devices, with no fissile material, by the end of the decade, he'll have a nuclear weapon. But if fissile material is provided to Saddam Hussein, he'll have a nuclear weapon within a year, so I'd say the year is the outside timetable.

The bad news is that Iran wants to talk about everything except their nuclear program. They want to talk about regional cooperation, they want to talk about the sanctions issues, and it seems like the western powers want to talk about nothing more than the nuclear issue.

You can't say that religion or irreligion will give us a particular answer to the nuclear dilemma.

If the nuclear program is indeed meant only for civil purposes, then it is wrong to impose sanctions.

We're out of nuclear-crisis mode and into normal, day-to-day crisis mode.

If they don't close these [nuclear] reactors down, we'll have civil war in five years.

We have built something [a nuclear stockpile] bigger than we can drive.

The fact is that there is now, we know well, a proliferation of nuclear weapons, and that many weapons that Saddam Hussein had, we don't know where they are. That means terrorists have access to all of that.

Every nuclear bomb is an Auschwitz waiting to happen.

Nuclear arms kill many people all at once, but other weapons kill many people, little by little, every day, everywhere in the world.

With regard to nuclear weapons, it's kind of hard to say. [Donald Trump] is said lots of things. The national security experts are terrified. But they're more terrified by his personality than by his statements.

It's a near miracle that nuclear war has so far been avoided.

As far as U.S. intelligence knows, Iran is developing nuclear capacities, but they don't know if they are trying to develop nuclear weapons or not. Chances are they're developing what's called 'nuclear capability,' which many states have. That is the ability to have nuclear weapons if they decide to do it. That's not a crime.

When people know we are ready to use nuclear weapons, they're going to back off if we do something aggressive. So basically, nuclear weapons are always being used.

The threat and use of violence is stimulating nuclear proliferation along with jihadi terrorism.

In the future, if nuclear weapons are unleashed there will be no front and no rear.

I think Donald Trump is very, very cautious about nuclear weapons, and he's seriously concerned. And this might be one of the reasons he wants to deal with Putin carefully, because he's aware of how many nuclear weapons Putin has, and that Russian doctrine is much more open about using nuclear weapons than is American doctrine.

Iran - the world's leading sponsor of terrorism - is close to having nuclear weapons.

Chemical and biological attacks are scary and will kill a lot of people but dont rise to the level of nuclear.

I thought to myself, what is everyone's worst fear? Nuclear terrorism in America.

American nuclear weapons would almost certainly start being removed from Britain within 12 months of a Labour government gaining power.

I wouldn't call myself anti-nuclear. I seek a society non-reliant on nuclear energy, a society that can do without nuclear energy, and Japan can prove a role model. It’s possible.