I would reject the distinction between a Keynesian moment and a behavioral moment.
We might have new issues involving information technology for example, or new questions arising out of the war on terror, or new issues arising from natural disasters that can't be anticipated.
This is a very, very conservative judge who in his dissenting opinions is overwhelmingly likely to be more conservative than the majority.
Wikipedia works because those who know the truth are usually more numerous and committed than those who believe in a falsehood.
I think that every state in the union should recognize same-sex marriage.
Catholicism is a wide tent in terms of political and legal positions. We could have nine Catholics on the Supreme Court and a great deal of diversity toward the law.
I'm interested in how the Internet spreads information.
