I read reviews of critics I respect and feel I can learn something from. Right now there are a lot of bottom-feeder critics who just have access to a computer and don't necessarily have an academic or cinema background that I can detect, so I tend to ignore that and stay with the same top-tier critics that I've come to respect. I like reading a good review - it doesn't have to be favorable, but a well-thought-out one - because I very much appreciate the relationship of directors and critics.
My favorite travel pastime is writing music, either with my guitar or on my computer.
As I get ready to buy a new computer, I'm stunned at all the many micro drafts, of different chapters and scenes and whatnot, that litter the hard drive.
A computer scientist is a machine for converting coffee into urine.
In computers, every 'new explosion' was set off by a software product that allowed users to program differently.
Standards are always out of date. That's what makes them standards.
I saw the logarithmic growth of computer power.
I don't have any computers in my studio, it's all analog tape. All analog tape, all old equipment, I mean my mics are like from the 60's and early 70's, everything in there is old.
Computers are like horses; they can sense fear and will act based on that.
The New York Hilton is laid out with a competence that would make a computer blush.
Why we do what we do: that moment when you get to see the future on your computer screen before the rest of the world.
