The president of the United States and the secretary of defense would not assert as plainly and bluntly as they have that Iraq has weapons of mass destruction if it was not true, and if they did not have a solid basis for saying it.
I think you have always heard, and you continue to hear from officials, a measure of high confidence that, indeed, the weapons of mass destruction will be found.
We know for a fact that there are weapons there.
I think the burden is on those people who think he didn't have weapons of mass destruction to tell the world where they are.
Given the chance to throw off a brutal dictator like Saddam Hussein, people will rejoice.
The press is hostile to Donald Trump, they always will be. And Donald Trump is happy to return the favor. And you know what, he actually has the upper hand in that relationship.
It's so much easier to do press if you take positions that the press likes than to take conservative Republican positions.
There is already a mountain of evidence that Saddam Hussein is gathering weapons for the purpose of using them. And adding additional information is like adding a foot to Mount Everest
The greatest threat to the security of the people of North Korea comes from the government of North Korea.
We have high confidence that they have weapons of mass destruction. That is what this war was about and it is about.
This is a massive crisis for the press, and the degree now that the press revs up its scrutiny and its opposition to Donald Trump, as opposed to being neutral and fair to Donald Trump - they will compound their own problem, because Republicans don't trust them, independents largely don't trust them, and the press risks just being credible to only one party in America.
The press lost credibility with Republicans and independents during the Obama years, setting itself up for the damage that's going to be done during the Trump years.
Why then would people look to the United Nations as an instrument of peace, if instead all it is, is an instrument of putting out declarations that nobody intends to take seriously anyway?
I think it's important for the people to see the government is functioning.
If he declares he has none, then we will know that Saddam Hussein is once again misleading the world.
When President George W. Bush cut taxes, he cut them for everyone.
The 2000s were marked by terrorism and a bipartisan desire to fight it.
If Mr. Obama wants to get things done, he must recognize that in Washington only the president has the power to make the first big move.
The president typically never does comment on anything involving the Supreme Court cases, Supreme Court ruling, or Supreme Court finding, typically.
The press secretary who starts to narrow down or close the president's options because he answers delicate negotiating questions no longer serves the president.
...President [Bush] believes that [high-energy consumption] is an American way of life, and that it should be the goal of policymakers to protect the American way of life. The American way of life is a blessed one.
If Democrats were good at thinking like Republicans, they would see the light and stop being Democrats.
Bush to USSS: 'We need to get back to Wash. We don't need some tin horn terrorist to scare us off.'
I get a kick out of Democrats thinking they know how handicap a GOP race.
Anytime James Carville, Paul Begala and David Axelrod hold hands and jump for joy, it's worth pondering how to turn their joy into tears.
