Why should it not be the whole function of a word to denote many things?
"Philosophical Papers". Book by J. L. Austin, edited by James Opie Urmson, Geoffrey James Warnock, p. 38, 1979.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d33b9/d33b98f0b39ddd29a671aa77b12274c12edfe0d8" alt="Why should it not be the whole function of a word to denote many things?"
Why should it not be the whole function of a word to denote many things?